[seqfan] Re: Subset of A152824

[Joshua Zucker]

All same nonzero remainder is what the author suggested when I checked
with him, so no 1s or 2s in the numbers, but my terms are not the only
ones either.

I will generate the correct list and submit it shortly.

If you are interested, Farideh, you could submit these other two sequences.

Thanks,
--Joshua

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:19 AM,  <f.firoozbakht at sci.ui.ac.ir> wrote:
>
> According to the current definition terms of the sequence up to 1000
> are:
>
> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 22, 24, 33, 36, 44, 48, 55, 66, 77,
> 88, 99, 111, 112, 115, 122, 124, 126, 128, 132, 135, 144, 155, 162,
> 168, 175,184, 212, 216, 222, 223, 224, 244, 248, 264, 288, 289, 312,
> 315, 324,
> 333, 336, 337, 338, 366, 379, 384, 386, 396, 412, 424, 432, 433, 434, 444,
> 446, 448, 469, 477, 488, 515, 555, 612, 624, 636, 648, 649, 666, 669, 672,
> 673, 674, 676, 677, 728, 735, 737, 777, 784, 787, 788, 816, 824, 848, 864,
> 866, 868, 869, 888, 936, 938, 999.
>
> But if we change the definition as I wrote before the terms up to 8000 are:
>
> 223, 289, 337, 379, 433, 469, 477, 649, 673, 2227, 2233, 2263, 2269, 2323,
> 2437, 2449, 2623, 2629, 2773, 2833, 3223, 3277, 3349, 3433, 3493, 3889, 4249,
> 4333, 4393, 4429, 4633, 4873, 4933, 4969, 6223, 6229, 6433, 6637, 6679, 6763,
> 6949, 7267, 7477, 7939.
>
>
> Farideh
>
>
> Quoting Joshua Zucker <joshua.zucker at gmail.com>:
>
>> Thanks as always to everyone for the polite, friendly, and helpful
>> hints, suggestions, and corrections.
>>
>> In particular:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:50 AM,  <f.firoozbakht at sci.ui.ac.ir> wrote:
>>> I think definition of the sequence A152824 according to the
>>> first five terms isn't correct.
>>> A better definition: Numbers n such that the remainder of n when dividing
>>> by each digits of n is equal to one.
>>
>> Uh oh!  Should 338 be in the sequence or not?
>>
>> If it should be in the sequence then I need to do a little revision of
>> my program.
>>
>> I suppose I should ask the original author what the intent was, and
>> that's what I'll go do now.
>>
>> I personally don't find it interesting enough to think that both
>> sequences, the one beginning 223 289 337 338 379 386 433 434 446 469
>> 477 649 669 673 674 676 677 737 787 788 866 868 869 938 and the one
>> beginning 223 289 337 379 433 469 477 649 673, need to be in OEIS, but
>> if someone else disagrees I'm happy to submit whichever one the author
>> didn't intend.  (Probably it's best to direct such emails to me rather
>> than further cluttering the list.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Joshua Zucker
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> University of Isfahan (http://www.ui.ac.ir)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>