A082287: A001221(1)=0 hence 1'd be absent in A082287 ?!

[zak seidov]

Neil, Reinhard, seqfans,

Isn't it more logical (and fun) 
to drop 1,
and change %N to: 

%N A082287 n>0 appears omega(n) times, where 
omega(n)=A001221(n) is the number of distinct 
prime factors of n; 1 is absent, or,
"1 appears "zero" times",  because omega(1)=0.

(*as in OEIS at present*)
%I A082287
%S A082287 1,2,3,4,5,6,6,7,8,9,10,10,11,12,12,
%N A082287 n>1 appears omega(n) times, where 
omega(n)=A001221(n) is the number of distinct 
prime factors of n, a(1)=1.
%O A082287 1,2
%A A082287 Reinhard Zumkeller
(reinhard.zumkeller(AT)lhsystems.com), Apr 07 2003



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping