Q: Association A049591 and A105399

[zak seidov]

see also
A067774  Primes p such that p+2 is not a prime. 
Zak
 
--- Tanya Khovanova <mathoflove-seqfan at yahoo.com>
wrote:

> These sequences are the same except the initial 3.
> 
> A049591  	 	 Odd primes p such that p+2 is
> composite.
> 
> A105399  	 	 Largest prime <= numbers of the form
> 6k+3 (duplicates
> removed).
> 
> Proof. All primes starting from 5 are of the form
> 6k+1 or 6k+5.
> 
> Obviously, all primes of the form 6k+1 belong to
> both sequences. 
> 
> The primes of the form 6k+5 belong to the first
> sequence iff they are
> not the smallest of the twin prime pairs. For such
> k, 6k+7 is
> composite, and because 6k+9 is composite and of the
> form 6m+3, such a
> prime belongs to the second sequence too. The
> opposite is trivial/
> 
> Tanya
> 
> --- Richard Mathar <mathar at strw.leidenuniv.nl>
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Dear prime aficionados: Any ideas why A049591 and
> A105399 are
> > essentially the
> > same? If there is reason: a comment in A105399 and
> A067774 would be
> > useful,
> > perhaps also in A105792...
> > Is A133387 essentially a stuttering version which
> resumes one of
> > these
> > after removal of duplicates?
> > 
> > Richard
> > http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~mathar
> > 
> 
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ