A025151 and A026826

[Richard Mathar]

I disagree.  Vacuously, all parts of the empty partition are >= 3, so 
there is one
partition of 0 into distinct parts >= 3.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Mathar <mathar at strw.leidenuniv.nl>
...

The (mild) problem that I see is that A025147 and A025148 have an 
offset of 0
which would mean "there is 1 partition of 0 into distinct parts >= 3," 
and this
is wrong.  As long as one extends the definition for A025147..A025155 
by
clinging
to the g.f. including the term 1*x^0, this is kind-of alright.
One ought perhaps split A025147 and A025148 into two different 
sequences each in
the manner it has been done for the higher k-numbers.
...


**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com




Dear Seqfans,  Making changes to an entry is tricky, but
just adding lines is easy.

So there is a new web page to do this:

Use this for adding something to an entry in the OEIS
(a comment, formula, example, reference, link, program, etc.),
but not yet to add more terms.

The idea is that this will be used for a large fraction of the "Comments"
that are sent in, and will be easy for me to process (and easy later
for the associate editors to approve, though that part is still to
be written).

To find the new page, go to "Contribute new seq. or comment",
and the link is at the top.

Please use this whenever possible.  It's much easier to ADD something
to an entry rather than to make CHANGES.

There will surely be bugs - let me know how it works.

To get a hard new line, end the line with \Q (backslash Q)

Neil