Query on sequence of dynamics of iterating A113172 Scrabble value of English word for the number n.
Maximilian Hasler
maximilian.hasler at gmail.com
Thu Jul 3 05:25:29 CEST 2008
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 17:03, Jonathan Post <jvospost3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you, Maximilian Hasler.
>
> I wrestled with the same question of index (0 or 1 step to get to orbit).
>
> I DON'T know there aren't any other cycles than the orbit of 9. I
> don't even know that A113172(n) <= n for all sufficiently large n.
> Hence I don't know that there are not infinite orbits.
I "conjecture" that n=1..8 and the fixed point 12 are the only values for which
A113172(n) is not strictly smaller than n.
Thus, there cannot be a fixed point other than 12 nor a cycle other
than [4,7,8,9],
and any number ends at one of these two. (This would give rise to
another sequence, but I don't think it is worth submitting to OEIS, at
least not during Summer...)
> So I continue (by hand: someone coding this might be nice) and, for
> that matter, coding would allow someone to do an extension of A113172
> to answer some of these questions:
The following code prints out the orbit up to the moment where a point
is reached for the second time.
Note that you stopped either at 12 or at 9, but 8, 7 and 4 should also
be ending points.
Regards,
Maximilian
orbit(n,p=1)={ local(nn=n,t=0); until( bittest(t,n=A113172(n)),
t+=1<<n; p && print1(n" -> "));n }
for(n=31,72,print(orbit(n)))
31 -> 15 -> 13 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
32 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
33 -> 20 -> 12 -> 12
34 -> 19 -> 8 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8
35 -> 22 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
36 -> 22 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
37 -> 20 -> 12 -> 12
38 -> 21 -> 15 -> 13 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
39 -> 16 -> 14 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
40 -> 12 -> 12
41 -> 15 -> 13 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
42 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
43 -> 20 -> 12 -> 12
44 -> 19 -> 8 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8
45 -> 22 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
46 -> 22 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
47 -> 20 -> 12 -> 12
48 -> 21 -> 15 -> 13 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
49 -> 16 -> 14 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
50 -> 14 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
51 -> 17 -> 12 -> 12
52 -> 20 -> 12 -> 12
53 -> 22 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
54 -> 21 -> 15 -> 13 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
55 -> 24 -> 19 -> 8 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8
56 -> 24 -> 19 -> 8 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8
57 -> 22 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
58 -> 23 -> 20 -> 12 -> 12
59 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
60 -> 15 -> 13 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
61 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
62 -> 21 -> 15 -> 13 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
63 -> 23 -> 20 -> 12 -> 12
64 -> 22 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
65 -> 25 -> 22 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
66 -> 25 -> 22 -> 18 -> 12 -> 12
67 -> 23 -> 20 -> 12 -> 12
68 -> 24 -> 19 -> 8 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8
69 -> 19 -> 8 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8
70 -> 13 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
71 -> 16 -> 14 -> 11 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9
72 -> 19 -> 8 -> 9 -> 4 -> 7 -> 8
> n trajectory of iterated A113172(n)
> 31 31,15,13,11,9
> 32 32,18, 12
> 33 33,20,12
> 34 34,19,8,9
> 35 35,22,18,12
> 36 36,22,18,12
> 37 37,20,12
> 38 38,21,15,13,11,9
> 39 39,16,14,11,9
> 40 40,11,9
> 41 41,14,11,9
> 42 42,17,12
> 43 43,19,8,9
> 44 44,18,12
> 45 45,21,15,13,11,9
> 46 46,21,15,13,11,9
> 47 47,19,8,9
> 48 48,20,12
> 49 49,15,13,11,9
> 50 50,14,11,9
> 51 51,17,12
> 52 52,20,12
> 53 53,22,18,12
> 54 54,21,15,13,11,9
> 55 55,24,19,8,9
> 56 56,24,19,8,9
> 57 57,22
> 58 58,23,20,12
> 59 59,18,12
> 60 60,15,13,11,9
> 61 61,18,12
> 62 62,21,15,13,11,9
> 63 63,23,20,12
> 64 64,22,18,12
> 65 65,5,22,18,12
> 66 66,25,22,18,12
> 67 67,23,20,12
> 68 68,24,19,8,9
> 69 69,19,8,9
> 70 70,13,11,9
> 71 71,16,14,11,9
> 72 71,19,8,9
>
> Length to orbit or fixed point is a record:
> 0,2,38, what next?
>
> You're right, though, that I should cease psychoanalysis of seqfans,
> as I am unqualified, and it's rude.
>
> On 7/1/08, Maximilian Hasler <maximilian.hasler at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 15:53, Jonathan Post <jvospost3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > There must be a better way than this artifice:
>> > a(n) = -k if k is the least number iterations of A113172(n) to reach a
>> > fixed point
>> > a(n) = 0 if n is a fixed point under A113172
>> > a(n) = +j if j is the least number of iterations before entering a cycle.
>> >
>> > n a(n) comment
>> > 0 3 because 0->ZERO->13-> THIRTEEN ->11->
>> > ELEVEN->9->NINE->4->FOUR->7->SEVEN->8->EIGHT->9 looping
>>
>> > ...
>>
>> > 8 2 because (8,9)
>> > 9 1 because 9 begins the (9,4,7,8,9,4,7,8,9,4,7,8,9,...) loop
>>
>>
>> Q: why a(9)=1 ?
>> Zero iterations are needed to get into the loop!
>>
>>
>> > 17 -2 because (17,12) gets to a fixed point
>>
>>
>> again : ONE iteration takes to the f.p.
>> else it is not reasonable to say that 12 is at distance 0 of a fixed point.
>>
>> Maybe a better convention would be:
>> a(n)>0 is the number of elements in orbit(n) ending at a fixed point,
>> a(n)<=0 is - the number of steps needed to reach a point of a cycle
>> (I suppose there aren't any others than the orbit of 9.)
>>
>> Then:
>> a(n)=1 <=> n is a fixed point
>> a(n)=0 <=> n is element of a cycle
>>
>> Alternative:
>>
>> > I'm getting a sense of who's in the equivalence class who hates "word"
>> > sequences and who is the in equivalence class who finds them
>> > interesting.
>>
>>
>> I don't think these are equivalence classes.
>> I even think that each of the two "belongs to" relations are ill
>> defined. At least for me, "hating"(?) or "finding interesting" is not
>> a function of the "word" kw alone.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Maximilian
>>
>
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list