a new Wagstaff prime

[Artur]

Dear Seqfans,
I have some doubtness with terminology
A007500 <http://www.research.att.com/%7Enjas/sequences/A007500> 
"Palindromic" primes
A002385 <http://www.research.att.com/%7Enjas/sequences/A002385> 
Palindromic primes
Best wishes
Artur


Jonathan Post pisze:
> Since the digital reversal 191689 is prime, the prime exponent 986191
> is an emirp.
>
> There, I mixed a serious and impressive result with a base sequence
> that not everyone cares for;)
>
> And if you turn that reversal upside-down, you get 689161 = 11 * 31 *
> 43 * 47 which is a 4-brilliant number.  What's that sound?  Wagstaff
> rolling in his grave?  Sorry...
>
> On 6/19/08, Max Alekseyev <maxale at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> A new Wagstaff (probable) prime has been found: (2^986191+1)/3.
>>  Currently it takes the 4th place in PRP Records:
>>  http://www.primenumbers.net/prptop/prptop.php
>>
>>  Please update A000978
>>
>>  Regards,
>>
>> Max
>>
>>     
>
> __________ NOD32 Informacje 2701 (20071204) __________
>
> Wiadomosc zostala sprawdzona przez System Antywirusowy NOD32
> http://www.nod32.com lub http://www.nod32.pl 
>
>
>
>