Fwd: Has this problem been raised ?

[Alexander Povolotsky]

Sorry missed "the  seqfan world" in my reply to Max

AP
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alexander Povolotsky <apovolot at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: Has this problem been raised ?
To: Max Alekseyev <maxale at gmail.com>

>To find a solution (i,j,k,m,n) to this equation? In integers?

 Yes

>  Anyway, one needs just to take m large enough so that every floor in
 >  the equation turns into 0.

 Of course I meant m<i, m<k, m<l
 (I thought that condition was obvious ;-) )

 Regards,
 Alex



 On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Max Alekseyev <maxale at gmail.com> wrote:
 > What is the problem?
 >  To find a solution (i,j,k,m,n) to this equation? In integers?
 >  Anyway, one needs just to take m large enough so that every floor in
 >  the equation turns into 0.
 >
 >  Regards,
 >  Max
 >
 >  On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Alexander Povolotsky
<apovolot at gmail.com> wrote:
 >  > Hi,
 >  >
 >  >  floor((i/m)^n) + floor((k/m)^n) = floor((l/m)^n)
 >  >
 >  >  n > 2, m > 1, i > 0,  k > 0, l > 0, i != k
 >  >
 >  >  Has this problem been raised and resolved (one way or another) ?
 >  >
 >  >  Thanks,
 >  >  Best Regards,
 >  >  Alexander R. Povolotsky
 >  >
 >