number of partitions bench mark

[Alec Mihailovs]

> 2008/5/13 N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>:
>
> These errors in Maple seem bad enough to be placed on record,
> so I'm making a new entry (it will be A110375 at the
> next update) to preserve them.
>
> Neil

I asked in Mapleprimes whether that holds also for Maple 12,

http://www.mapleprimes.com/forum/a110375

and received a reply from Alejandro Jakubi that Maple 12 gives the same 
answer as Maple 11 for the first term, and a reply from Robert Israel, that 
also for the other terms. So the definition of the sequence can be extended 
to include Maple 12 as well.

Alec Mihailovs