[seqfan] Re: Test

Marc LeBrun mlb at well.com
Fri Nov 21 16:57:22 CET 2008


I suggest you might want to get your mailer to generate, say,

   Reply-To: Sequence Fanatics <seqfan at seqfan.eu>

instead of the current

   Reply-To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>

That way many folks' readers, address books, etc will use the preferred form.

Best regards, with many thanks for your service,

(full header detail as received cited below for reference)


X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-the_well_p (2008-06-10) on
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [])
	by mh.well.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mAKCwaV7008303
	for <mlb at mh.well.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:58:36 -0800
X-WELL-Auth: No
Received: from stirling.seqfan.eu (stirling.seqfan.eu [])
	by smtp.well.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mAKCsm9Q026947
	for <mlb at well.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:54:54 -0800
Received: from localhost ([] helo=stirling.seqfan.eu)
	by stirling.seqfan.eu with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu>)
	id 1L393W-0006UI-Sp; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:54:46 +0100
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([])
	by stirling.seqfan.eu with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <olivier.gerard at gmail.com>) id 1L393S-0006UD-6H
	for seqfan at list.seqfan.eu; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:54:42 +0100
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so344910fgb.26
	for <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:54:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id b11mr715960bkq.127.1227185681856;
	Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <335cf8920811200454r62f4d6dbk8bfc5212307587f4 at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:54:41 +0100
From: "Olivier Gerard" <olivier.gerard at gmail.com>
To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
In-Reply-To: <766844.83577.qm at web38203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <335cf8920811110321r251e6e50qf214bdfd0a8b82b4 at mail.gmail.com>
	<766844.83577.qm at web38203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Subject: [seqfan] Re: Test
X-BeenThere: seqfan at list.seqfan.eu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
List-Id: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan.list.seqfan.eu>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://list.seqfan.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seqfan>,
	<mailto:seqfan-request at list.seqfan.eu?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan>
List-Post: <mailto:seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
List-Help: <mailto:seqfan-request at list.seqfan.eu?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://list.seqfan.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seqfan>,
	<mailto:seqfan-request at list.seqfan.eu?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu
Errors-To: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.1, clamav-milter version 0.94.1 
on wodehouse.well.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-UIDL: b#V!!@kC"!L]`"!;i/!!


There are normally identical for the user
but if I need to make a distinction I recommend

seqfan at seqfan.eu

This is shorter and besides
this address is first handled by a network of
dns and mail servers of my isp, so it is
less subject to failure.


On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:46, zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com> wrote:
 > Dear Olivier,
 > which of these two addresses are the best
 > (not to dublicate messages),
 > thx, zak
 > seqfan at seqfan.eu
 > seqfan at list.seqfan.eu


Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/

More information about the SeqFan mailing list