[seqfan] Re: 2^n - 2
Leroy Quet
q1qq2qqq3qqqq at yahoo.com
Sat Apr 11 18:38:03 CEST 2009
Never mind. Poulet numbers, which are composite, will have an a(n) of 1, which is not their greatest proper divisor.
Yes, it was a dumb question.
Sorry, thanks,
Leroy Quet
--- On Sat, 4/11/09, Leroy Quet <q1qq2qqq3qqqq at yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Leroy Quet <q1qq2qqq3qqqq at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [seqfan] 2^n - 2
> To: seqfan at seqfan.eu
> Date: Saturday, April 11, 2009, 4:32 PM
>
> Let a(n) be the smallest positive integer such that
> a(n)* (2^n - 2) is divisible by n.
>
> This is probably a dumb question, but is
> {a(k)} the same as sequence A032742, where A032742(n) = the
> largest proper divisor of n?
>
> Thanks,
> Leroy Quet
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list