[seqfan] Re: Suggested keyword: veri
franktaw at netscape.net
franktaw at netscape.net
Sun Apr 12 23:05:03 CEST 2009
Yes, but there are 150,000 sequences there, and only a handful have any
such entry. The vast majority of them are machine-calculated, and
checking them is mostly a waste of time. What this keyword would do is
to let someone willing to do such checking know where such efforts
might
profitably be employed.
I recognize that, with the current effort towards a Wiki OEIS, this
isn't
going to happen right away. I'll see what it looks like in that
incarnation,
and then perhaps make a new proposal.
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert G. Wilson, v <rgwv at rgwv.com>
Neil suggested several years ago that any one who verified the sequence
in
question do so by using the %Edit line with the method employed. Example
Entries verified by ??? using the supplied Mmca coding.
Robert G. "Bob" Wilson, V
Joshua Zucker wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 4:30 AM, <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:
>
>>I've been opposed to various keywords people have suggested recently,
>>but this is one that I think should be added. It would be an
>>indication that the values in the sequence should be independently
>>verified, preferably using a program. I'm suggesting "veri" for this
>>keyword, but I'm open to other suggestions.
>
>How about the opposite - namely, a little box you can check on a seq,
>and enter your name, stating that you've verified the terms by
>hand-computation, or that you've verified the terms using a program?
>(Or a form you can submit with a copy of the terms you've computed, if
>you want to allow for the fact that some sequences are hard to check
>and people can just check the first few terms. Though probably in
>such cases it's only the last known term that you really want to have
>checked.)
>
>Then, the page can by default display just the count of each (the
>original author can contribute 1 to one or both counts), and maybe
>there can be a way to find out who did the computation in case you
>want to talk to them about their program or something.
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list