[seqfan] Re: delete or not delete?

[franktaw at netscape.net]

I have in fact received a reply from the author, who says "If the 
remark seems irrelevant or inappropriate under A006093, then I suggest 
that it be transferred and coupled as an extension to comment of 
sequence A002385 by David Wasserman".  I am going to do that.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Orlovsky <4vladimir at gmail.com>

*Message: 4
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:21:05 +0100
From: Klaus Brockhaus <klaus-brockhaus at t-online.de>

*It definitely should be deleted.*
*Klaus Brockhaus*

Q: why `delete`?
why NOT contacting author, before doing this drastic mesure?
definitely or maybe?!

p.s.
This is my first note to the `seqfan` .

Every time I read your emails,
I always have only one question;
*what actually do you trying/want to do?*
Seems to me, that every one has something to say,
sure,
every one has and entitle to have opinion,
but...
what actually common goals, styles, objectives and criterias?!

Do you have common goals?..
...or you just THINK, you do?

I do Not mean like `*make better place*`,
(by the way, that's will be nice too)
but little bit more specific and technical, and to the point.
it have to be some kind of range and boundaries.

Q1: Quality or Quantity?
Q2: Math or cute staff?
Q3: Authoritarianism or community?
Q4: Helpful or Narcissistic and Snobby?
Q5: Questionable directions or well-defined?
Q6: Definitely or Maybe?

Maybe it's just me, but feels ...
well... not very promising.

--
/All opinions are mine only/
Vladimir Orlovsky
4vladimir at gmail.com