[seqfan] Re: delete or not delete?

Alonso Del Arte alonso.delarte at gmail.com
Fri Dec 4 06:50:44 CET 2009

I knew someone was going to ask the author before taking any drastic
measures. None of the Associate Editors were chosen with a view to being
trigger-happy with the Delete button.

To try to address Vladimir's other questions:

Q1: Quality or Quantity? Quality.
Q2: Math or cute staff? Mostly math, but there's a small place for the cute
Q3: Authoritarianism or community? Authoritative rather than authoritarian.
Q4: Helpful or Narcissistic and Snobby? Helpful, but as we're human,
snobbishness will occasionally show, and need correction.
Q5: Questionable directions or well-defined? Well-defined, but not written
in stone. And defined mostly by mathematics.
Q6: Definitely or Maybe? Definitely.


On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:50 PM, <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:

> I have in fact received a reply from the author, who says "If the
> remark seems irrelevant or inappropriate under A006093, then I suggest
> that it be transferred and coupled as an extension to comment of
> sequence A002385 by David Wasserman".  I am going to do that.
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Orlovsky <4vladimir at gmail.com>
> *Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:21:05 +0100
> From: Klaus Brockhaus <klaus-brockhaus at t-online.de>
> *It definitely should be deleted.*
> *Klaus Brockhaus*
> Q: why `delete`?
> why NOT contacting author, before doing this drastic mesure?
> definitely or maybe?!
> p.s.
> This is my first note to the `seqfan` .
> Every time I read your emails,
> I always have only one question;
> *what actually do you trying/want to do?*
> Seems to me, that every one has something to say,
> sure,
> every one has and entitle to have opinion,
> but...
> what actually common goals, styles, objectives and criterias?!
> Do you have common goals?..
> ...or you just THINK, you do?
> I do Not mean like `*make better place*`,
> (by the way, that's will be nice too)
> but little bit more specific and technical, and to the point.
> it have to be some kind of range and boundaries.
> Q1: Quality or Quantity?
> Q2: Math or cute staff?
> Q3: Authoritarianism or community?
> Q4: Helpful or Narcissistic and Snobby?
> Q5: Questionable directions or well-defined?
> Q6: Definitely or Maybe?
> Maybe it's just me, but feels ...
> well... not very promising.
> --
> /All opinions are mine only/
> Vladimir Orlovsky
> 4vladimir at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/

More information about the SeqFan mailing list