[seqfan] Re: On Formulas

[Olivier Gerard]

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 21:22,  <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:
>
> One more type, that I omitted, is transforms.
>

I think they need a separate template table altogether, focusing
on  sequence to sequence   relations  so that the web of transformable
sequence is easily browsable.

We did not mention  algebraic/operator/differential equations. This is
important as certain sequences cannot be defined otherwise than
implicit solutions of such constraints.

Olivier