[seqfan] Re: Most efficient way to construct a list of pandigital palindromic numbers?

[Andrew Weimholt]

On 12/7/09, Alonso Del Arte <alonso.delarte at gmail.com> wrote:
>  ...enough for my purpose, which is to verify the validity of
>  A168334<http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A168334> and
>  perhaps add another four or eight terms.

Also remember to add the "base" keyword while you are editing it. :-)

Andrew