[seqfan] Re: David Wilson's candy question

David Wilson dwilson at gambitcomm.com
Tue Feb 3 22:17:52 CET 2009

This sort of question is notoriously difficult.

We do not know, for example, whether there are an infinite number of 
squares involving only the digits 2,4 and 8. There doesn't seem to be a 
family of such squares, so the statistics argue for a finite number, but 
proving this is currently impossible, and it is yet harder to prove that 
we have all the values. ;-)  I suspect the finiteness of my sequence 
will rest on an open question of this sort.

I'm not much worried about credits, or even adding this sequence to the 

zak seidov wrote:
> Ok, 
> i also get some 2000 terms and more are possible,
> but what to do with it & with
> OEIS_in_Feb-Mar and David's credits?
> Better you submit it,
> zak
> ps main problem with finiteness is open,
> though me pesonally rather think that it's finite...

More information about the SeqFan mailing list