[seqfan] Re: A061653 offset
N. J. A. Sloane
njas at research.att.com
Thu Feb 5 21:39:52 CET 2009
Tanya said yesterday:
> I keep being confused with offsets. Should the offset for A061653 be 2?
It starts with n=2.
I am not certain, but I believe the entry is correct. Did you look
at Washington? The first term is for n=1, so the offset is 1.
I see there was a followup to Tanya's email, but I seem to
have lost it - it came from M F Hasler, but I no longer have it
- maybe you are Maximilian could send it to me again?
More information about the SeqFan