[seqfan] Re: A061653 offset

N. J. A. Sloane njas at research.att.com
Thu Feb 5 21:39:52 CET 2009

Tanya said yesterday:

> I keep being confused with offsets. Should the offset for A061653 be 2?
It starts with n=2.


I am not certain, but I believe the entry is correct.  Did you look
at Washington?  The first term is for n=1, so the offset is 1.

I see there was a followup to Tanya's email, but I seem to
have lost it - it came from M F Hasler, but I no longer have it
- maybe you are Maximilian could send it to me again?


More information about the SeqFan mailing list