[seqfan] Re: A159848 and A162402 are the same

[Dmitry Kamenetsky]

That really bothers me. You have authored 2171 sequences, 232 of which 
have the 'more' keyword, so need extension.

Dmitry


Leroy Quet wrote:
> Darn it. I calculate my sequences by hand, not even using a calculator. I am also error-prone -- that is why I don't submit many terms. So, probably all my sequences that have not yet been extended should be checked.
>
> Sorry everybody, thanks,
> Leroy Quet
>
>
> --- On Fri, 7/17/09, Prof. Dr. Alois Heinz <heinz at hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
>
>   
>> From: Prof. Dr. Alois Heinz <heinz at hs-heilbronn.de>
>> Subject: A159848 and A162402 are the same
>> To: seqfan at seqfan.eu, njas at research.att.com
>> Cc: reinhard.zumkeller at gmail.com, q1qq2qqq3qqqq at yahoo.com
>> Date: Friday, July 17, 2009, 2:17 PM
>> Both sequences are essentially the
>> same (with an offset of 1):
>>
>> http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A159848
>> http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A162402
>>
>> In A162402 a(7)=8 is not correct, it should be 6+3=9.
>> Later values are also not correct.
>>
>> I vote for deletion of A162402 and A162403 which depends
>> on A162402.
>>
>> (The correct version of A162403 is already in the OEIS:
>> A159849)
>>
>> Alois
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>       
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>