[seqfan] Re: Not Binary Palindrome (even with leading 0's)

[franktaw at netscape.net]

Agreed.  A062019 should be marked as "dead", with the description 
changed to "Erroneous version of A057891."

(I think it's been out there too long to just delete it.)

There are cross-refs to A062019 in A057890 and A061917; these should be 
changed to A057891.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Chandler <rayjchandler at sbcglobal.net>

> A062019 contains 93, while A057891 does not.
>
> 93 in binary is: 1011101, which is a binary palindrome.
>
> So, either A062019 erroneously contains 93, or it erroneously
> claims to be the compliment of A057890.

93 does not belong in A062019.  A062019 is the complement of A057890, 
and is
therefore the same as A057891.
Ray Chandler