[seqfan] Re: A093893 Subsequence

Maximilian Hasler maximilian.hasler at gmail.com
Sat May 30 05:45:40 CEST 2009

> The lack of findings esp. for a(17) may look like bad news for my simple
> heuristical argument that a(n) is defined for (almost?) all n.

a(17) = 120121 ^ 16 =


More information about the SeqFan mailing list