[seqfan] Re: Another surprising omission from OEIS
maximilian.hasler at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 15:10:13 CET 2009
> in some vague sense from 3 to 1). A167389 is a real example of this:
> though not base-dependent, it seems to be an entirely arbitrary
anyway, if I see
then I already have some prejudice...
"argument(...)/2pi" does not improve anything ...
IMO that's complete nonsense, but of course I might be wrong...
Whatsoever, I think it is insulting to "submit" such a thing and let
tens or hundreds of people try their best in making a sense of it.
More information about the SeqFan