[seqfan] Re: ,base, sequences
ic_designer at verizon.net
Sat Nov 14 16:25:33 CET 2009
I don't think it merits "dumb". The sequences I've seen that are marked "dumb" are a lot worse than those.
But it clearly needs "base".
--- On Fri, 11/13/09, franktaw at netscape.net <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:
From: franktaw at netscape.net <franktaw at netscape.net>
Subject: [seqfan] Re: ,base, sequences
To: seqfan at list.seqfan.eu
Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 12:52 AM
Sorry, but by my standards, those are dumb. I wouldn't reject the
sequences; but I certainly would not have submitted them.
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
From: zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com>
A175038/9 In the sequence of natural integers, number/sum of digits
- dumb :-(
or nice :-)
--- On Fri, 11/13/09, Andrew Weimholt <andrew.weimholt at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Andrew Weimholt <andrew.weimholt at gmail.com>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: ,base, sequences
> To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 3:27 AM
> > Search: keyword:nice keyword:base author:seidov
> > 2 results found:
> > A121759 In decimal number system, take even digits of
> n with negative sign.
> > A121758 In decimal number system, take odd digits of n
> with negative sign.
> > And I bet that ,nice, is not of mine -
> > Neil did it ( many thanks, Neil! :-) )
> > Zak
> Well, they do have a nice graph. :-)
Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan