[seqfan] Re: Another surprising omission from OEIS
Michael Porter
ic_designer at verizon.net
Wed Nov 11 03:26:45 CET 2009
I wasn't able to find it. I did find A053696, numbers that are repunits (as opposed to repdigits) with at least 3 digits in some base.
- Michael
--- On Tue, 11/10/09, Andrew Weimholt <andrew.weimholt at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Andrew Weimholt <andrew.weimholt at gmail.com>
Subject: [seqfan] Another surprising omission from OEIS
To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 5:58 PM
Numbers that are repdigits with length > 2 in some base.
(length > 2 because all numbers n > 2, are trivially represented as 11
in base n-1)
7 = 111 base 2
13 = 111 base 3
15 = 1111 base 2
21 = 111 base 4
26 = 222 base 3
31 = 11111 base 2 (also 111 base 5)
40 = 1111 base 3
42 = 222 base 4
43 = 111 base 6
57 = 111 base 7
62 = 222 base 5
63 = 111111 base 2 (also 333 base 4)
73 = 111 base 8
80 = 2222 base 3
85 = 1111 base 4
86 = 222 base 6
91 = 111 base 9
93 = 333 base 5
111 = 111 base 10
114 = 222 base 7
121 = 11111 base 3
124 = 444 base 5
127 = 1111111 base 2
129 = 333 base 6
133 = 111 base 11
7, 13, 15, 21, 26, 31, 40, 42, 43, 57, 62, 63, 73, 80, 85, 86,
91, 93, 111, 114, 121, 124, 127, 129, 133, 146, 156, 157,
170, 171, 172, 182, 183, 211, 215, 219, 222, 228, 241, 242,
255, 259, 266, 273, 285, 292, 307, 312, 314, 333, 341, 342,
343, 364, 365, 366, 381, 399, 400, 421, 422, 438, 444, 455,
463, 468, 471, 482, 507, 511, 518, 532, 546, 549, 553, 555,
585, 601, 614, 624, 628, 633, 637, 651, 665, 666, 682, 686,
703, 723, 728, 732, 757, 762, 777, 781, 785, 798, 800, 813,
819, 820, 842, 844, 871, 888, 915, 921, 926, 931, 942, 964,
993, 999, 1014, 1023, 1029, 1036, 1055, 1057, 1064, 1092,
1093, 1098, 1099,1106, 1111
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list