[seqfan] Re: Another surprising omission from OEIS

[zak seidov]

--- On Thu, 11/12/09, zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: Another surprising omission from OEIS
> To: "seqfaneu" <seqfan at seqfan.eu>
> Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 1:43 PM
> Some statistics for ,base, sequences
> in OEIS
> 
> Last modified November 11 15:30 EST 2009. 
> Contains 166424 sequences. 
> 
> Search: keyword:base
> 21555 results found.
> 21555/166424=1/7.72 (,standard,)
> 
> Search: author:njas
> 35130 results found.
> Search: author:njas keyword:base
> 1030 results found.
> (But look at A006880  Number of primes < 10^n. - 
> why ,base,?)
> 1030/35130=1/34.11 (5 times less than standard)
> 
> Search: author:seidov
> 2257 results found.
> Search: author:seidov keyword:base
> 672 results found.
> 672/2257=1/3.36 (2 times larger than standard :-( )
> 
> What we (non-profi seqfans) should learn from this?
> I constantly hear that ,base, sequences are not interesting
> to matematicians. 
> But who are submitters of these 
> one_of_each_8 sequences? 
> And what is the future (WIKI?) fate of them?
> 
I mean Sequences  not Submitters ;-)

> Only questions, not answers,
> Zak