[seqfan] Re: A160376, handling duplicate or incorrect entries
N. J. A. Sloane
njas at research.att.com
Sat Oct 24 23:27:29 CEST 2009
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this discussion.
I agree that A160376 (when corrected) is a duplicate,
and I am going to delete it.
There is no point is keeping duplicate entries in the OEIS,
unless (a) they have been in the OEIS for many years,
or (b) they are wrong, but have been published somewhere,
possibly on the web, in which case we keep the wrong one,
saying "Incorrect version of A......". That way
if someone looks up the wrong sequence, they get a pointer
to the correct sequence.
More information about the SeqFan