[seqfan] Re: re Integers formed by concatenating primes

[Leroy Quet]

Is the base 2 version in the EIS? I have not checked. What about this sequence with other bases (3,4,5,6, etc)?

In general, I suggest, someone should add all the base-2 missing 'base' sequences that already exist in the database as base 10 versions (submitted by Eric Angelini and others), and submit base 10 versions of 'base' sequences that involve base 2 (submitted by me and others).
And of course, someone could calculate and submit the base 3, base 4, base 5, etc versions of both the base 10 and the base 2 sequences, if these sequences do not already exist in the database.
:)

Thanks,
Leroy Quet


[ ( [ ([( [ ( ([[o0Oo0Ooo0Oo(0)oO0ooO0oO0o]]) ) ] )]) ] ) ]


--- On Thu, 10/15/09, Eric Angelini <Eric.Angelini at kntv.be> wrote:

> From: Eric Angelini <Eric.Angelini at kntv.be>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: re Integers formed by concatenating primes
> To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009, 12:23 PM
> 
> Thanks, Neil -- sorry for the missing 31,
> Best,
> É.
> 
>  
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu
> [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu]
> De la part de N. J. A. Sloane
> Envoyé : jeudi 15 octobre 2009 13:26
> À : seqfan at seqfan.eu
> Objet : [seqfan] re Integers formed by concatenating
> primes
> 
> 
> >this seq seems absent from the OEIS:
> 
> S =
> 2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,22,23,25,27,29,32,33,35,37,41,43,47,52,53,55,57,59,61,67,71,72,73,75,77,
> 79,83,89,97,101,103,107,109,112,...
> 
> 
> Me; You left out 31, I think?  but it is still
> missing and I will add it
> 
> Neil
> 
>