[seqfan] Re: A160376

[Charles Greathouse]

It's worth noting that A160376(11) is wrong by any reasonable
interpretation, as 33916801 does not divide 11! + 1.

I would mark it as a dupe.

Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Michael Porter <ic_designer at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> I'm looking at A160376, and I think the description should be "Largest prime divisor of (n!+1)..." instead of "Largest divisor of (n!+1)".  For example, 9!+1 = 362881 = 19*71*269, so the largest divisor is 71*269=19099, but the largest prime divisor is 269, which is the value in the sequence.  I think the author probably meant "Largest prime divisor", but this would make it a duplicate of A002583.
>
> What should I do?
>
> - Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/