[seqfan] Re: relation A091440 to A167348

[franktaw at netscape.net]

I agree that they are duplicates.  I have submitted a merged version of 
A091440.

I would recommend that A167348 be retained as a dead sequence instead 
of being deleted; someone may again search for 2,2,3,7,....

Note that these could be considered two valid sequences, one allowing 
only primes and the other allowing non-primes.  Ironically, their 
descriptions would need to be reversed for this to work.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Mathar <mathar at strw.leidenuniv.nl>

I see that the sequences A091440 and A167348
differ at n=1, because the PARI program in A167348 does not
define primorials smaller than 2, wheras A091440 makes it
very clear what its definition of primorials are. I cannot find
the alternative where p# >= 2 in the OEIS. Does this mean
that A167348 is just an erroneous version of A091440?

http://research.att.com/~njas/sequences/?q=id:A167348|id:A091440
2,2,3,7,13,23,43,79,149,257,461,821,1451,2549,4483,7879,13859,24247,42683
,75037,131707,230773,405401,710569,1246379,2185021,3831913,
1,2,3,7,13,23,43,79,149,257,461,821,1451,2549,4483,7879,13859,24247,42683
,75037,131707,230773,405401,710569,1246379,2185021,3831913,6720059,117815
51,20657677,36221753,63503639,111333529,195199289,

RJM