[seqfan] Re: Concatenation

Charles Greathouse charles.greathouse at case.edu
Fri Apr 23 18:07:17 CEST 2010


Sorry, I didn't mean to imply otherwise.  Essentially all of these
notations are defined before use, because none are common enough to be
known.  I wrote the original message as a result of coming across //
and not remembering having seen it before, even though it seems to be
the most common of the various notations I outlined.

Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University



On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Leroy Quet <q1qq2qqq3qqqq at yahoo.com> wrote:
> It should be noted that I only sometimes use U (not my notation originally). And even then, somewhere in the definition I always note that this means concatenation.
>
> In my opinion, I don't care if there is a standard notation, just as long as it is noted in the definition or comments that the notation used means concatenation.
>
> Thanks,
> Leroy Quet
>
> [ ( [ ([( [ ( ([[o0Oo0Ooo0Oo(0)oO0ooO0oO0o]]) ) ] )]) ] ) ]
>
>
> --- On Fri, 4/23/10, Charles Greathouse <charles.greathouse at case.edu> wrote:
>>...
>> Leroy Quet uses U for concatenation, as in A165784.
>>...
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>




More information about the SeqFan mailing list