[seqfan] Re: A175388(?)

[zak seidov]

--- On Sun, 4/25/10, Richard Mathar <mathar at strw.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:
> A176709 shouldn't be referenced > because it's a duplicate of
> A003621

Me: OK, thanks!!
Also NJAS pointed it to me!!
In case I'll submit A175388,
I'd take into account all remarks
from all those responded -
thanks again to you all
(and sorry to rush with such a raw sequence :().
Zak 

> From: Richard Mathar <mathar at strw.leidenuniv.nl>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: A175388(?)
> To: seqfan at seqfan.eu
> Date: Sunday, April 25, 2010, 5:49 AM
> 
> zs> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
> zs> From: zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com>
> zs> To: seqfaneu <seqfan at seqfan.eu>
> zs> Subject: [seqfan]  A175388(?)
> zs> ...
> zs> ...
> zs> %Y A175388 Cf. A002275, A176709. 
> 
> A176709 shouldn't be referenced because it's a duplicate of
> A003621
> and threatened to be eliminated . See
> http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~mathar/progs/oeisDupl 
> as usual.
>