[seqfan] Re: Unedited sequence

[Alonso Del Arte]

I thought I could pull up the relevant volume of the JRM but online I only
have access for 2003 to 2005 (go figure).

For now I'm under the assumption that (10^9999) + n is meant rather
than 10^(9999
+ n).

Al

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Charles Greathouse <
charles.greathouse at case.edu> wrote:

> Would someone check
> http://oeis.org/classic/A142587
> edit it as needed, and remove keyword:uned?  It's the parallel sequence to
> http://oeis.org/classic/A074282
> using the standard Yates-Caldwell terminology.
>
> Charles Greathouse
> Analyst/Programmer
> Case Western Reserve University
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>