[seqfan] Re: Unedited sequence

[Alonso Del Arte]

With Charles being a professional programmer, I think that's a fair
assumption to make. With uned sequences by other authors I would not assume
that they've observed operator precedence in their notation.

Al

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:22 PM, N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>wrote:

> > For now I'm under the assumption that (10^9999) + n is meant rather
> than 10^(9999
> + n).
>
> Me: certainly! a^b+c always means (a^b) + c.
>
> > Would someone check
> > http://oeis.org/classic/A142587
> > edit it as needed, and remove keyword:uned?
>
> Me: I will remove "uned"!
>
>
>  Best regards
>                         Neil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>