[seqfan] Re: Sequence data deletion

Charles Greathouse charles.greathouse at case.edu
Sun Dec 5 00:15:35 CET 2010

It is my view (subject to revision!) that too-long sequence numbers in
existing entries should not be deleted unless (1) the sequence is
properly marked keyword:easy or (2) the term is moved to a b-file.

Charles Greathouse
Case Western Reserve University

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:36 PM, William Rex Marshall
<w.r.marshall at actrix.co.nz> wrote:
> There has now been a deletion from sequence data on the grounds of a
> term having 118 digits. If necessary, couldn't the extra data have been
> included in a b-file? I wouldn't have deleted the extra term from the
> data without Neil's advice.
> http://oeis.org/history?seq=A175347
> _______________________________________________
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/

More information about the SeqFan mailing list