[seqfan] Re: OEIS A104778 and A104779

N. J. A. Sloane njas at research.att.com
Sun Dec 26 18:28:36 CET 2010

Wouter, I suggest you add your version,
> 1, 1, 3, 7, 21, 57, 182, 565,   1931,...
> the sum of the Kostka numbers.

as a new entry in the OEIS.
Then we can add cross-references if we even find
out what is wrong with the other sequence, if there
is anything wrong. It may be just a coincidence.



More information about the SeqFan mailing list