klaus-brockhaus at t-online.de
Tue Feb 9 20:42:19 CET 2010
Recent addition (Feb 07 2010) just discovered:
%N A173035 Cat years in human years: a(1) = 15, a(2) = 24, a(n) = a(n-1) + 4 for n >= 3.
Is there some kind of biological basis for such assertions?
Without any reference it seems rather arbitrary.
OK, the sequence is well-defined by the recursion formula,
but the interpretation is rather dubious.
Or would you like to see similar entries for crocodile, elephant, kangaroo, mosquito ...
More information about the SeqFan