[seqfan] Re: controversial claims in A063684

[Sean A. Irvine]

Sorry, that was my bad.  I think I have fixed it up now.

Here are the required factorizations to demonstrate membership of 78 and 80,
but not 89, 95, 97, 98, 103, 104. (Others are ruled out because of n!+1
factorizations).

78!+2 = 2.577.1069.3389.6435049.1767365513.114886791444297161936182421452692846283.P52
80!+2 = 2.229.67384773611957979501943750969.P88
89!+2 = 2.1277.42901.5378159949931.18329483167904576214066484477.6810195626101031667062474517145920193.P51
95!+2 = 2.17179526668332291511177515032665197915604399.P105
97!+2 = 2.907.521193998771047100549.236157312077318104169985332274963948199.P90
98!+2 = 2.31003012014959.114951592532951.2015644865638913835753087050212028452990938458387.P78
103!+2 = 2.4472034037.P155
104!+2 = 2.211.2929973.75981758014016744056814526435927187708907.P117
105!+2 = 2.193957.(2787722944364706869316656026336584010168867604094986463866157541551030723072395307534619881022103456796548716815768519976061376768596742618459967931036260614466093)


Max Alekseyev wrote:
> In A063684 there are two controversial claims:
> 
> "87, 91 and 92 are also terms"
> 
> "The next term is 105 or greater"
> 
> Can somebody verify which one is correct and remove the other?
> 
> Max
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>