[seqfan] Re: A127589 Primes of the form 16k+5: prime k(?)

[Artur]

Thank you for finding error!
Should be

All these prime numbers are the sum of two squares and if k is also prime is a sum 
               of two squares. Proof (Artur Jasinski): according to Fermat's theorem 
               all prime numbers of the form 4n+1 are sum of two squres. Also 16k+5 
               = 4(4k+1)+1.


Best wishes
Artur

zak seidov pisze:
> Values of k in A127589 are not always a sum of two squares (see A127590),
>
> and %C A127589 may be shortened to:
>
> %C A127589 All these prime numbers are the sum of two squares.
>
> Or even better, 
> %C A127589 may be totally omitted (?) 
>
> Zak
>
> %%%%%%%%%%% as at present in OEIS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> %S A127589 5,37,53,101,149,181,197,229,277,293,373,389,421,613,661,677,709,757,
> %N A127589 Primes of the form 16k+5.
> %C A127589 All these prime numbers are the sum of two squares and k is also a sum 
>                of two squares. Proof (Artur Jasinski): according to Fermat's theorem 
>                all prime numbers of the form 4n+1 are sum of two squres. Also 16k+5 
>                = 4(4k+1)+1.
>
> %S A127590 0,2,3,6,9,11,12,14,17,18,23,24,26,38,41,42,44,47,48,51,53,62,63,66,68,
> %N A127590 Numbers n such that 16n+5 is prime.
>
>
>       
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>