[seqfan] Re: On the Parity of Stanley's Partition Function -- should a comment go in A097567 or elsewhere?
Richard Mathar
mathar at strw.leidenuniv.nl
Tue Jun 15 19:09:41 CEST 2010
Concerning the arXiv:1006.2450 mentioned in
http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/2010-June/005038.html :
The sequence f(n) in their equation (1.2) is A085261.
The sequence t(n) in their equation (1.3) is A097566, (after the term a(0)=0
is added to A097566)
The sequence u(n)=p(n)-t(n) = A000041(n)-A097566(n) in their equation (2.5)
= 0,0,2,2,0,2,10,10,2,10,36,36,12,36,110,110,46,112,300,300,146,310,752,754,410,
788,1770,1780,1052,1880,3958,3992,2522,4256,8480,8580,5726,9222,17528,17790,12426,
19260,35122,35754,25960,38958 (offset 0) (needs to be checked!)
seems not to be in the OEIS(TM).
RJM
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list