[seqfan] Re: A169828: more terms? in pairs (6k,6k+1)?

[Alois Heinz]

Next two are: 988496761674, 988496761675

988496761674 = 1110011000100110111111111001001101001010 (base 2)
988496761674 =               10111111111001001101001010 (base 3)

Alois

zak seidov schrieb:
> 1. No more terms <12*10^9.
> Anyone care to check/extend this?
>
> 2. Is suggestion that entries appears in pairs
> (6k,6k+1) OK? At least first six entries are.
>
> 3. Thanks, Zak