[seqfan] Re: Too many boring sequences

zak seidov zakseidov at yahoo.com
Tue May 4 09:39:57 CEST 2010

Dear Neil,
once and again -
I suggest to make two files
"received" and "accepted"(=recent.txt).
As it is usual in all refereed journals.
Besides, rejected submissions are also of some import -
for authors and for all users of OEIS.

With great respect to the enormous work
single-handly done by you,

--- On Mon, 5/3/10, N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com> wrote:

> From: N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>
> Subject: [seqfan]  Too many boring sequences
> To: seqfan at seqfan.eu
> Cc: vincenzo.librandi at tin.it, 2stepan at rambler.ru, njas at research.att.com, rlbagulatftn at yahoo.com
> Date: Monday, May 3, 2010, 2:22 PM
> Dear Sequence Fans and the "Usual Suspects"
> As you know, since October 2009, the OEIS is owned by the
> OEIS Foundation.  However, because the OEIS Wiki is
> not
> operational, I still have to process every sequence
> myself.
> The number of emails I'm getting each day is now over 200
> (this includes comments and new submissions, but not
> spam).
> Some of you have been abusing the system, by submitting
> huge numbers of uninteresting sequences, most of which
> need editing.  I have been very lenient this year
> (up to the end of April). But this has to stop.
> Today I rejected many sequences that were submitted in the
> past 
> three days, and I will continue to do this.
> As always, sequences that arise from real problems are
> always welcome,
> as is an occasional well-formatted sequence which is a
> variation
> on an existing sequence.
> Neil Sloane
> _______________________________________________
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/


More information about the SeqFan mailing list