[seqfan] Re: A139261

[franktaw at netscape.net]

It seems to me that when, as for these sequences, a sequence is 
considered interesting for other than obvious mathematical reasons, 
some indication of the reason for its inclusion should be provided. 
This could be a short comment, a link to a web site, or a link to 
another sequence where some explanation is provided.

With all due respect, I must say that -- even with Omar's comment below 
-- I don't see much value in these sequences. (Their correctness was 
never in question.)

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>

Dear Seqfans,
Omar Pol - who is a member of the seqfan list -
wrote to me privately saying he feels the comments
about his sequences were unfair.  I must say that I agree
with him.   Among other things, he said:

> I feel unfairly attacked in the seqfans
> list. My  sequences are correct and I think that they contain nice 
triangles
> related with art and symmetry.

I would urge everyone on the list to respect
fellow sequence-fan's feelings.

As I said before, I am not going to delete that sequence.