[seqfan] Re: question from Alexander P-sky

[franktaw at netscape.net]

No, it isn't. I'm not sure why it should be.

If it's just because A002024 is a lower bound for A063655, then A000267 
is a better one along the same lines.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>

Dear Sequence Fans,  Alexander asked me:

Hi Neil,

Is A063655 - A002024 in OEIS ?

If not - is it worth putting it there ?

Thanks,
Best Regards,
Alex


I don't have time to look at this - could someone reply to him?