[seqfan] Re: question from Alexander P-sky
apovolot at gmail.com
Thu May 13 03:14:16 CEST 2010
>If it's just because A002024 is a lower bound for A063655
Sort of - but I rather thought about it in terms of A063655 being a
high bound of A002024
On 5/12/10, franktaw at netscape.net <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:
> No, it isn't. I'm not sure why it should be.
> If it's just because A002024 is a lower bound for A063655, then A000267
> is a better one along the same lines.
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
> -----Original Message-----
> From: N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>
> Dear Sequence Fans, Alexander asked me:
> Hi Neil,
> Is A063655 - A002024 in OEIS ?
> If not - is it worth putting it there ?
> Best Regards,
> I don't have time to look at this - could someone reply to him?
More information about the SeqFan