[seqfan] Re: Suggested rename.

[Robert G. Wilson v]

Et al,

    That will be easy since I already have it for a different sequence.

Bob.

--------------------------------------------------
From: <franktaw at netscape.net>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 12:51 AM
To: <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Subject: [seqfan] Re: Suggested rename.

> Personally, I'm OK with it either way; but the second example line 
> should be changed to use the same name used in the title. (Or just 
> merge it into the previous line, and drop the reiteration of the title 
> entirely.)
> 
> Plus I think the first "References" line should actually be a "Comment" 
> line.
> 
> It would be nice if somebody were to produce an a-file that shows not 
> only the sequence, but also the representation. I.e., starting like:
> 
> 1 127 = -1 + 2^7
> 2 343 = (3 + 4) ^ 3
> 3 736 = 7 + 3^6
> 4 1285 = (1 + 2^8)* 5
> 
> (Or the same without the equal signs.)
> 
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert G. Wilson v <rgwv at rgwv.com>
> 
> Might I suggest that the sequence,  A080035  "Good" Friedman numbers: 
> Friedman
> numbers (A036057) where the construction digits are used in the proper 
> order.
> 
>      be renamed from "Good" to "Orderly".
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/