[seqfan] Re: CROSSREFS

Jeremy Gardiner jeremy.gardiner at btinternet.com
Sat Oct 23 10:31:19 CEST 2010

Too late now, but such errors would be caught be mandating that sequence
numbers be multiples of 11 ;-)

Have often thought this convention would avoid mis-dialled phone numbers,
but of course inefficient use of number ranges.

On 23/10/10 08:23, "hv at crypt.org" <hv at crypt.org> wrote:

> Vladimir Orlovsky <4vladimir at gmail.com> wrote:
> When there is no obvious relationship between a sequence and its crossref,
> it may simply be a typo - we've had numerous examples in the past of
> a crossref with a wrong digit, or a pair of digits transposed.

More information about the SeqFan mailing list