[seqfan] Re: CROSSREFS
jeremy.gardiner at btinternet.com
Sat Oct 23 10:31:19 CEST 2010
Too late now, but such errors would be caught be mandating that sequence
numbers be multiples of 11 ;-)
Have often thought this convention would avoid mis-dialled phone numbers,
but of course inefficient use of number ranges.
On 23/10/10 08:23, "hv at crypt.org" <hv at crypt.org> wrote:
> Vladimir Orlovsky <4vladimir at gmail.com> wrote:
> When there is no obvious relationship between a sequence and its crossref,
> it may simply be a typo - we've had numerous examples in the past of
> a crossref with a wrong digit, or a pair of digits transposed.
More information about the SeqFan