[seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?
zakseidov at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 30 04:58:35 CEST 2010
We are waiting for wiki too long...
And then we need to learn how to use it...
Meanwile why Ass.Eds can not discuss (NEW and old) SEQs
among themselves not bothering the whole list right now -
all we need is the good will and the separate list of AE addresses, right?
All the best,
--- On Wed, 9/29/10, Alonso Del Arte <alonso.delarte at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Alonso Del Arte <alonso.delarte at gmail.com>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?
> To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Date: Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 1:12 PM
> For what it's worth, I think it's the
> way to go for now. Once we have the
> wiki all set up, the Associate Editors can discuss such
> sequences on a
> case-by-case basis and decide whether to fix the problems
> ourselves, kick it
> back to the author for corrections, or reject it outright.
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM, N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>wrote:
> > Doug, there are two or three people whose submissions
> > always contain errors. How would you suggest that we
> handle this?
> > Neil
> > >A recent sequence has (what seems) an unusual
> warning that the
> > contributor's sequences are often in error. Is
> this really the way to
> > go?
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan