[seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?

[Andrew Weimholt]

On 9/29/10, zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Meanwile why Ass.Eds can not discuss (NEW and old) SEQs
> among themselves  not bothering the whole list right now -
> all we need is the good will and the separate list of AE addresses, right?

I'm not sure what the rest of the list thinks about that, but I for one, enjoy
being able to see all of the discussions. I believe it is beneficial
for non-AE members such as myself to be aware of the issues and criticisms
that the AEs raise regarding various submissions.

Andrew