[seqfan] Re: Quick question about self-avoiding walks
N. J. A. Sloane
njas at research.att.com
Mon Dec 12 15:21:01 CET 2011
> I don't like the phrasing "reduced for symmetry" and I feel there
should be a better one. Any suggestions?
One solution is to say: Number of equivalence classes of [...] under
rotations and reflections [or whatever the group is]
or ... under the group generated by rotations and reflections ...
And I agree that if possible one should submit
the sequences corresponding to all the obvious groups.
More information about the SeqFan