[seqfan] Re: Quick question about self-avoiding walks

N. J. A. Sloane njas at research.att.com
Mon Dec 12 15:21:01 CET 2011

> I don't like the phrasing "reduced for symmetry" and I feel there
should be a better one.  Any suggestions?

One solution is to say: Number of equivalence classes of [...] under
rotations and reflections [or whatever the group is]

or ... under the group generated by rotations and reflections ...

And I agree that if possible one should submit
the sequences corresponding to all the obvious groups.

 Best regards

More information about the SeqFan mailing list