[seqfan] Re: A090864 == A118300

[Max Alekseyev]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Charles Greathouse
<charles.greathouse at case.edu> wrote:
>> A090864 and A118300 agree for the terms given for both sequences.  I believe
>> them to be the same due to the comment from Perry in the related sequence
>> A006906 that A006906 has the same parity as A000009.
>>
>> https://oeis.org/search?q=3%2C+4%2C+6%2C+8%2C+9%2C+10%2C+11%2C+13%2C+14%2C+1
>> 6&sort=&language=english
>>
>> Any objections to merging the two sequences into A090864 and "killing"
>> A118300?
>
> It's clear that A006906 and A000009 have the same parity.  But I don't
> see how that makes A090864 and A118300 the same.

There is a comment in A118300 stating that A000009(a(n)) = A118303(n).
These two comments together give the anticipated equality of A090864
and A118300.

Regards,
Max